Posted: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 3:38PMMetro Airport Explores Wind Power |
Detroit Metropolitan Airport will further reduce its consumption of fossil fuels by producing its own wind energy at two locations on opposite ends of the facility. The Wayne County Airport Authority Board approved a contract with Michigan-based Southern Exposure Renewable Energy Co. to install five wind turbines at the airport entrance on Rogell Drive and at the South Cell Phone Lot on Eureka Road. Unlike the traditional, towering, three-blade, windmill-type turbines, the Windspire units, manufactured by MasTech Manufacturing of Manisee, are cylindrical, vertical-axis wind turbines that operate quietly while generating electricity for immediate use regardless of wind direction. At only 30-feet in height, they easily fit within DTW’s airspace height limitations. “We have calculated that the two units at the South Cell Phone Lot will, on average, generate 60 to 70 percent of the power needed for the lot’s overhead lights and to illuminate the sign,” said WCAA Director of Facilities and Infrastructure Ali Dib. “On windy days and during daylight hours, we will be feeding electricity back to DTE Energy’s grid.” The wind energy project is one of many environmentally friendly initiatives at the airport. DTW has been the world leader in recycling aircraft de-icing fluid for eight of the past nine years. The new North Terminal is programmed to harvest daylight and to automatically reduce lighting and cooling in terminal areas not in use. The North Terminal also supplies pre-conditioned air, 400hz power and underground jet fuel to each gate which reduces the need for aircraft engines to be idling and excess vehicles on the ramp. This is expected to reduce emissions of various air pollutants by more than 1,300 tons over the expected life-span of the building. The airport has installed a solar panel and LED lighting prototype at the North Cell Phone Lot and established more efficient electrical fixtures in the parking structures saving $79,000 in energy costs annually. In 1999, Detroit Metropolitan Airport received international acclamation for the creation of Crosswinds Marsh, a 1,000-acre wetland preserve constructed in Sumpter Township to replace airfield wetlands disturbed by runway and terminal construction. Described as “Michigan’s showcase wetland,” the preserve continues to provide spectacular habitat for a variety of wildlife and offers public access and educational opportunities for children. “Many other such initiatives are under way or planned for the future,” said WCAA CEO Lester Robinson. “We continue to look for opportunities to be a friend to the environment while maintaining one of the most operationally-capable airports in the world.” |
Thursday, November 19, 2009
"Fly Me to the Moon!"
Pontiac Schools Community Meeting 11-18-2009 (WOW! A True Learning Organization Experience)
Executive Briefings
Published November 2009The Role of Curiosity in Learning
Dr. Bea Carson
When was the last time you asked a truly curious question? A question to which you had no idea what the answer was, a question that made the recipient say “hmm”? For many of us, the last time we were truly curious was when we were 5 years old — a naturally curious age.Institutional Learning
Institutional learning begins with our education system and has much to do with silencing natural curiosity. We send curious 5-year-olds to school, and the first thing they hear is “sit down and be quiet.” Soon after that, we stick a piece of paper in front of them and tell them “know the answers or you fail,” which is repeated for the next 12 to 16 years. Then they enter the workforce and are told “know the answers or you’re fired.”
Institutional learning is a traditional means of learning, where experts have knowledge that they dump into the heads of the students, and the students are expected to regurgitate it. The problem with this type of learning is that it creates a dependent state.
Because most leadership training happens in a classroom — away from the real issues — it can only be a discussion of leadership, not a true learning experience. Individuals learn much faster from experience than from lectures.
Individuals feel anxious when they learn something new. It is critical for these feelings to be part of the learning experience. By including the feelings, the student gets to the meaning of the learning and makes it a part of their being. The student must be empowered in order to survive work and life experiences.
It’s no wonder most of us have forgotten how to be curious — forgotten how to ask truly great questions. There are no rewards for asking great questions — the rewards go to those with the answers.
With the rewards going to those who know the answers, why would we want to be the one asking the questions? Why would we want to go back to being as curious as a 5-year-old?
But for an organization to become a learning organization, it needs to break out of the rut of doing things the same way. It needs to be open to learning and exploring the possible. The first step on the road to becoming a learning organization is to encourage a culture where it is safe to ask questions, a culture where employees are free to question everything.
The Power of Questions
The power of questions is multifaceted. By asking questions, we can:
- Uncover information about the things we do not know.
- Express an interest in what another person has to say.
- Draw another person into a conversation.
- Make it clear that we are not making assumptions and are open to possibilities beyond our initial reaction.
- Allow us to uncover underlying causes rather than simply looking at the symptoms.
- Encourage multiple perspectives.
When we ask someone a question, we force him or her to listen to us. It is only through listening that he or she will be able to respond to the question. Because questions indicate that we care what the other person has to say, trust and openness increase. Perhaps most importantly, questions help us reach a common truth.
What raises the bar from a question just being a question to being a great question?
Great Questions
Many times when a great question is asked, there is a pause in the conversation, followed by the statement, “good question.”
Great questions come from a place of great curiosity. They come from a place of being open to the possible. Great questions make us think more deeply about a situation, uncovering the truth behind what was previously taken for granted.
Great questions can be very difficult to ask because they take us outside our comfort zone. Great questions do not need to be complex.
One of the keys to being able to ask great questions is to listen. To pay attention to what is not said — the nonverbal signals — as well as what is said.
When structuring any type of learning, organizations should harness the power of questions to allow individuals’ natural curiosity to uncover every aspect of the knowledge being imparted and to maximize communications.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Sunday, November 15, 2009
NATIONAL Heavy Lifting MEET the PRESS (Arne Duncan) Sunday, November 15, 2009
ON EDUCATION begins at 19:30 of Video (PATIENCE PLEASE)
LEGISLATIVE Heavy Lifting GOVERNOR GRANHOLM
COMMENTARY
Education cuts put recovery at risk
Disinvestment in schools will discourage employers
BY JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM
This past week, superintendents, teachers and parents journeyed to Lansing to demand that the Legislature raise money for the School Aid Fund to prevent the deep cuts that will begin impacting our schools within weeks. I strongly support their efforts to prevent these cuts from happening. You don't need to have kids or grandkids in public schools to know that funding for education is vital to Michigan's economy.
This past week, superintendents, teachers and parents journeyed to Lansing to demand that the Legislature raise money for the School Aid Fund to prevent the deep cuts that will begin impacting our schools within weeks. I strongly support their efforts to prevent these cuts from happening. You don't need to have kids or grandkids in public schools to know that funding for education is vital to Michigan's economy.
Michigan is undergoing an unprecedented, historic economic transformation. The global manufacturing economy has shifted, and Michigan must accept the change and adapt. There's no time for denial, blame or finger-pointing; we must face this new reality head-on. What is the fundamental strategy for success in overcoming this challenge? Education, education, education.
An educated work force is the single most important asset we can have if we want to attract new investment and new good-paying jobs to our state in this knowledge-driven economy. Without action by the Legislature now, schools will have to disinvest -- laying off teachers and increasing class sizes. It has been estimated that these cuts could eliminate three thousand to five thousand jobs in our schools. The Legislature would justifiably do back-flips to bring a major employer with that number of jobs to our state. But so far, with an equal number of jobs at stake in our schools, the Legislature appears to be sitting on its hands.
The cause of this financial crisis in our schools could not be more clear. When our largest employers go bankrupt and citizens lose their jobs, state budget revenues plummet. It's particularly true for the school budget, which is funded in large part by the sales tax. When people don't shop during a recession, money for schools disappears. That's why our School Aid Fund is in deep trouble. Both of the state's nonpartisan fiscal agencies have issued warnings: There is not enough money to fund schools at current levels. The law mandates that when the money is not in the bank, school funding must be cut. But the story doesn't have to end there.
I have asked the Legislature to do two things. First, pass an immediate solution now. Second, work with me on long-term solutions to stabilize funding and reform our education system. In the short term, the Legislature can pass three targeted revenues to soften the blow to schools: freeze the personal exemption on the income tax at this year's level ($55 million), reduce special interest loopholes as much as we have reduced state government departments ($150 million) and tax loose tobacco and flavored cigarillos as we tax cigarettes ($35 million). These three, narrow measures would be a small price to pay to prevent devastating mid-year cuts to our schools.
Schools understand that they will have to accept some cuts this year. They will have to share services and consolidate. Teachers and administrators all must have skin in the game to channel every available cent to the classroom. But the additional deep cuts the Legislature is forcing on these schools cannot stand.
In addition to closing the gap in our School Aid Fund, the Legislature must act now to restore the Michigan Promise scholarship. In order to move our economy forward, we set an audacious goal of doubling the number of college graduates. The Michigan Promise scholarship, promised to almost 100,000 college students this year alone, has been a key part of that strategy. The Legislature eliminated it in the budget, making it much harder for Michigan students and Michigan families to afford higher education. I am asking the Legislature to raise the funds to keep that Promise. It is not too late.
Whether it's in our K-12 schools or in our colleges and universities, we must commit Michigan to educational greatness, not mediocrity. Every economist agrees that if we want a vibrant, diverse economy, we must have a skilled, educated workforce.
That's why I am joining with students, parents, educators and citizens across our great state to fight for a stable stream of revenue to ensure that goal is met. There's no more important issue in our state today if we want to promote economic recovery and more good-paying jobs in Michigan.
Jennifer M. Granholm is governor of Michigan.
HEAVY LIFTING: New Information on "Success Factors!"
School Districts to Be Big Players in Race to the Top Contest
It's clear now in the final rules for the Race to the Top grants that states will have to guarantee some big time buy-in from local school districts if they want to snag a slice of the $4 billion prize.
A state's "success factors," which include securing commitments from local districts, is worth 125 points of out of a total of 500. That's second only to teacher and principal effectiveness, worth 138 points. And of those 125 points, 65 are connected to how well a state can guarantee that local districts will carry out whatever reform agenda it proposes.
As Michele McNeil writes in her story today, the support of local school districts is so key that if there's a tie between states, and not enough money to award both of them, then the strength of the districts' commitment is the tiebreaker.
So, just how will a state's school district commitments be judged? According to the rules, states will have to show that districts, through binding agreements, have committed to "implement all or significant portions of the work outlined in the State's plan." On those agreements, Race to the Top judges will be looking for signatures of superintendents, school board presidents, and local teachers' union leaders, as well as "tables that summarize which portions of the State plans [local districts] are committing to implement and how extensive the [local district's] leadership support is."
I scoured the rules to find more on this, and, on page 223, found language explaining that once a state wins an RttT grant, its local districts will have three months to detail how they will implement the state's chosen reforms by completing "specific goals, activities, timelines, budgets, key personnel, and annual targets for key performance measures."
And if you look on page 768 (yes, I said page 768) of the full lineup of rules, you will find a "model" Memorandum of Understanding that the department would consider to be a strong agreement between states and their local school districts.
Judges will also be looking at not just how many districts have bought in, but how broad an impact they will have on student outcomes, which is probably good news for a state like California where it would be next to impossible to corral agreement from more than 1,000 school districts.
If California can get a few of its massive districts such as Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Long Beach, Sacramento, and Fresno to commit, the potential statewide impact would be broad indeed. Those six districts alone educate roughly 1 million of the state's 6 million public school children.
But would that be looked on as favorably, say, as a state like Colorado, where more than half of the 178 school districts have already signed letters of intent to indicate that they are on board?
HEAVY LIFTING: Underpinnings and Tent-poles
Full Report PDF Findings Recommendations State Profiles Methodology & Data FAQs Help 2007 Report Card
Overview
Two years ago, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Center for American Progress, and Frederick M. Hess of the American Enterprise Institute came together to grade the states on school performance. In that first Leaders and Laggards report, we found much to applaud but even more that requires urgent improvement.
In this follow-up report, we turn our attention to the future, looking not at how states are performing today, but at what they are doing to prepare themselves for the challenges that lie ahead. Thus, some states with positive academic results receive poor grades on our measures of innovation, while others with lackluster scholarly achievement nevertheless earn high marks for policies that are creating an entrepreneurial culture in their schools. We chose this focus because, regardless of current academic accomplishment in each state, we believe innovative educational practices are vital to laying the groundwork for continuous and transformational change.
In this follow-up report, we turn our attention to the future, looking not at how states are performing today, but at what they are doing to prepare themselves for the challenges that lie ahead. Thus, some states with positive academic results receive poor grades on our measures of innovation, while others with lackluster scholarly achievement nevertheless earn high marks for policies that are creating an entrepreneurial culture in their schools. We chose this focus because, regardless of current academic accomplishment in each state, we believe innovative educational practices are vital to laying the groundwork for continuous and transformational change.
And change is essential. Put bluntly, we believe our education system needs to be reinvented. After decades of political inaction and ineffective reforms, our schools consistently produce students unready for the rigors of the modern workplace. The lack of preparedness is staggering. Roughly one in three eighth graders is proficient in reading. Most high schools graduate little more than two-thirds of their students on time. And even the students who do receive a high school diploma lack adequate skills: More than 33% of first-year college students require remediation in either math or English.
We think of educational innovation not as a fad but as the prerequisite for deep, systematic change, the kind of change that is necessary--and long overdue.
But we also believe that reinvention will never be accomplished with silver bullets. Our school system needs far-reaching innovation. It is archaic and broken, a relic of a time when high school graduates could expect to live prosperous lives, when steel and auto factories formed the backbone of the American economy, and when laptop computers and the Internet were the preserve of science fiction writers. And while the challenges are many--inflexible regulations, excessive bureaucracy, a dearth of fresh thinking--the bottom line is that most education institutions simply lack the tools, incentives, and opportunities to reinvent themselves in profoundly more effective ways.
By "innovation" we do not mean blindly celebrating every nifty-sounding reform. If anything, we have had too much of such educational innovation over the years, as evidenced by the sequential embrace of fads and the hurried cycling from one new "best practice" to another that so often characterizes K-12 schooling. States and school systems, in other words, have too long confused the novel with the useful. Rather, we believe innovation to be the process of leveraging new tools, talent, and management strategies to craft solutions that were not possible or necessary in an earlier era.
Our aim is to encourage states to embrace policies that make it easier to design smart solutions that serve 21st century students and address 21st century challenges. The impulse to either dictate one-size-fits-all solutions from the top or simply to do something--anything--differently will not address our pressing needs. Instead, this report seeks to foster a flexible, performance-oriented culture that will help our schools meet educational challenges.
Today, various organizations are addressing stubborn challenges by pursuing familiar notions of good teaching and effective schooling in impressively coherent, disciplined, and strategic ways. Some are public school districts, such as Long Beach Unified School District in California and Aldine Independent School District in Texas. An array of charter school entrepreneurs are also working within the public school system and seeing encouraging results, such as the KIPP (Knowledge Is Power Program) Academies, YES Prep, Aspire Public Schools, Green Dot Public Schools, and Achievement First. Other independent ventures have also devised promising approaches to important challenges, including Citizen Schools, EdisonLearning, The New Teacher Project, K12 Inc., Blackboard Inc., Wireless Generation, Teach for America, and New Leaders for New Schools.
Even these marquee reformers, however, struggle to sidestep entrenched practices, raise funds, find talent, and secure support. Moreover, these highly successful ventures often pale when viewed beside the larger K-12 enterprise. The 80-odd KIPP schools, approximately 130 school leaders trained annually by New Leaders for New Schools, and 2,200 teachers trained each year by The New Teacher Project are dwarfed by the nation's 14,000 school districts, 100,000 schools, and 3.2 million teachers. The challenge is to boost the chance that creative problem solvers will ultimately make a real, lasting difference for our nation and our children.
Fortunately, our report comes at a time when national attention to educational innovation is on the upswing. The new federal Race to the Top Fund has brought additional attention to the need to rethink our system, for instance, while numerous other efforts are under way at the state and local levels. It is far too early to endorse any particular plan or to say which ones will be effective. But now is the time for state leaders to show the political will to pursue reform.
Along the way, high standards, accountability, and sensible progress measures are essential. But care must be taken not to allow familiar modes of measurement to smother reform. Too often, reformers tend to embrace only those advances that we can conveniently measure with today's crude tools, such as grades three-to-eight reading and math scores. The principal virtue of the No Child Left Behind Act, for example--a much-needed focus on outcomes and transparency--has been coupled with a bureaucratic impulse and an inflexible, cookie-cutter approach to gauging teacher and school quality. We must not retreat from the promise of high standards and accountability. But we should also embrace what might be called smart quality control. That means measuring the value of various providers and solutions in terms of what they are intended to do--whether that is recruiting teachers or tutoring foreign languages--rather than merely on whether they affect the rate at which students improve their performance on middle school reading and math tests.
Improved accountability and flexibility, while vital, will not be enough to achieve the changes we seek: Capacity building is also crucial. We define this overused term to mean the need for a variety of new providers that deliver additional support to educators in answering classroom and schoolwide challenges. More broadly, however, this effort must be complemented by giving new providers the freedom and encouragement they need to promote high-quality research and development, and to develop innovative "green shoot" reform ventures that pioneer more effective tools and strategies.
Ultimately, though, the key to improving results will be to help schools not only to avoid mistakes, but to position themselves better to adopt imaginative solutions. In brief, for reform to take hold our states and schools must practice purposeful innovation.
To examine the degree to which states have developed such a culture, we focused on eight areas:
- School Management (including the strength of charter school laws and the percentage of teachers who like the way their schools are run)
- Finance (including the accessibility of state financial data)
- Staffing: Hiring & Evaluation (including alternative certification for teachers)
- Staffing: Removing Ineffective Teachers (including the percentage of principals who report barriers to the removal of poor-performing teachers)
- Data (including such measures as state-collected college student remediation data)
- Technology (including students per Internet-connected computer)
- Pipeline to Postsecondary (including the percentage of schools reporting dual-enrollment programs)
- State Reform Environment (an ungraded category that includes data on the presence of reform groups and participation in international assessments)
Our data come from a wide variety of sources, from federal education databases to our own 50-state surveys. We should note that the data limitations we encountered were a significant hindrance to our efforts, even more so than when we prepared our first Leaders and Laggards report.
We received invaluable assistance from an outside panel of academic experts. We shared our methodology with Jack Buckley, professor of applied statistics at New York University; Dan Goldhaber, research professor at the University of Washington; Paul Herdman, president of the Rodel Foundation of Delaware; Monica Higgins, professor of education at Harvard University; and Richard Ingersoll, professor of education and sociology at the University of Pennsylvania. The panel reviewed our approach and results, and provided helpful feedback. However, our research team takes full responsibility for the methodology and resulting grades.
In many respects the recent troubles of the auto and newspaper industries provide a cautionary tale for today's education policymakers. Analysts predicted structural challenges in both industries for decades. Outside consultants urged major change. Yet altering entrenched practices at businesses from General Motors to the now-defunct Rocky Mountain News proved enormously difficult. And the results of inaction for both organizations were disastrous. The same must not happen to our nation's education system. The stakes are just too high.
The findings and recommendations detailed in the following section cover everything from the need for more thoughtful use of technology to the overarching importance of giving educators flexibility in meeting shared student-achievement goals. In particular, we believe that reform requires a nondoctrinaire emphasis on overhauling the status quo and replacing it, not with some imagined one best system, but with a new performance-oriented culture that may take many forms. In the end, we think of educational innovation not as a fad but as the prerequisite for deep, systematic change, the kind of change that is necessary--and long overdue.
As we observed two years ago in our first Leaders and Laggards report, even as businesses have revolutionized their practices, "student achievement has remained stagnant and our K-12 schools have stayed remarkably unchanged--preserving, as if in amber, the routines, culture, and operations of a 1930s manufacturing plant." Now, as we look forward, our aim is nothing less than to crush the amber. That is the challenge before us.
HEAVY LIFTING "Leaders and Laggards!" (Educational Innovation-Oxymoron)
Published Online: November 9, 2009
Published in Print: November 18, 2009, as States are Lagging on Innovation Front, New Score Card Says
Updated: November 13, 2009
States Lag in Educational Innovation, Report Says
‘Faint Pulse’ Found in Push Toward K-12 Improvement
Washington
A new report card on state-level innovation in education by a trio of ideologically varied groups reports what they see as deeply disturbing results, with most states earning C’s, D’s, or even F’s in such key areas as technology, high school quality, and removal of ineffective teachers.The report, “Leaders and Laggards,” uses state data and existing and original research to assign letter grades to states, based on seven indicators of innovation: school management, finance, hiring and evaluation of teachers, removal of ineffective teachers, data, “pipeline to postsecondary” (or high school quality), and technology.
Though the report released last week does not give states overall grades, the worst marks are in the category of removing ineffective teachers. But most states got C’s and D’s in the other categories.
“We found only a faint pulse of innovation,” said Thomas J. Donohue, the president and chief executive officer of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which co-sponsored the report and hosted a Nov. 9 event here surrounding the report’s release. “We must turn that into a strong heartbeat.”
Varied Interests
The report card is notable for its sponsorship by not only the Chamber of Commerce, which represents business interests, and the American Enterprise Institute, a free-market-oriented think tank, but also the Democratic-leaning Center for American Progress. All three groups are based in Washington.Among the sources for the report were data from the National Center for Education Statistics’ Schools and Staffing Survey, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, and the Editorial Projects in Education Research Center.
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan concludes remarks to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for a Competitive Workforce's annual education and workforce report on Nov. 9 in Washington.
—Andrew Councill for Education Week
All the sponsors agreed that the results were “deeply disturbing,” in the words of John Podesta, the president and CEO of the Center for American Progress, who served as White House chief of staff under President Bill Clinton.
But there were bright spots.
Massachusetts, Colorado, and Rhode Island got gold stars for their policies to promote extended learning time in schools, while Arizona, Ohio, and Florida got that designation for their aggressive charter school accountability approaches. Hawaii was singled out as the only state with a school-based funding policy. All are signals of innovation, according to the report.
Still, the 1.4 million-member American Federation of Teachers labeled the report as full of “old-hat, top-down measures that have failed to transform our schools,” according to a statement.
“The report’s recommendations are little more than a defense of the factory model of education, which has of late turned schools from havens for learning into test-taking factories,” AFT President Randi Weingarten said in the statement.
Multiple Factors
The report card incorporates many factors into a state’s overall letter grade for each of the seven indicators.To weigh innovation in teacher hiring and evaluation, for example, the researchers measured a state’s percentage of alternatively certified teachers (the higher the better), whether the state uses national programs (such as Teach For America) to recruit educators, and other factors.
What researchers were not doing was measuring “nifty, faddish experiments,” said Frederick M. Hess, the director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Instead, the analysis was meant to examine whether a state has created a “flexible, performance-oriented culture,” he said.
The report’s focus on innovation fits with the education agenda of the Obama administration, which last week released final rules for the Race to the Top Fund competition. The fund will award $4 billion in grants to states.
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, who gave opening remarks at the Nov. 9 event, said the quality of the country’s education system is as important an indicator of economic health as the “stock market, the unemployment rate, or the size of the GDP.”
The Chamber of Commerce, which is a powerful lobbying force at the federal, state, and local levels, has been at sharp odds with the Obama administration over health care and climate change.
But not on education.
“The administration is setting the right tone and putting its money where its mouth is,” Mr. Donohue said, specifically praising the Race to the Top initiative.
Secretary Duncan acknowledged the tension between the administration and the chamber, but said: “Education is the most bipartisan issue.”
The guiding principles behind Race to the Top—the so-called “four assurances” attached to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which includes money for the grants program among some $100 billion in education aid—appear to be here to stay. In exchange for receiving federal stimulus money, states have to agree to improve teacher effectiveness, data systems, academic standards, and their lowest-performing schools, according to the law.
Mr. Duncan used his remarks to emphasize that the administration wants to “embed” the four assurances into broader federal law, specifically the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, of which the No Child Left Behind Act is the current version.
He also highlighted his four other priorities for ESEA reauthorization, which is expected to get going next year: setting a high bar for states and districts, but allowing them to innovate; building in more competition for federal dollars; reviewing federal education spending line by line and focusing federal education aid on the programs that are most effective; and moving accountability from a “one-size-fits-all” approach to something more flexible.
Friday, November 13, 2009
HEAVY LIFTING: Dead Ahead!
Oakland Press
State schools chief says laws needed to get grants
Thursday, November 12, 2009
By TIM MARTIN
Associated Press Writer
Associated Press Writer
LANSING (AP) — Michigan’s top schools official says the state Legislature will have to pass new laws for the state to have a shot at federal stimulus money set aside for innovative education programs.
States are competing for a slice of more than $4B the Obama administration will earmark for schools that make aggressive changes. Fewer than half the states are likely to win a portion of the cash when it’s doled out beginning in April.
Applications are due in January.
Michigan schools superintendent Mike Flanagan says Thursday the changes would have to include tying student data and achievement to teacher performance.
States are being urged to pursue tougher academic and student performance standards, better teacher recruitment methods and plans to turn around failing schools.
States are competing for a slice of more than $4B the Obama administration will earmark for schools that make aggressive changes. Fewer than half the states are likely to win a portion of the cash when it’s doled out beginning in April.
Applications are due in January.
Michigan schools superintendent Mike Flanagan says Thursday the changes would have to include tying student data and achievement to teacher performance.
States are being urged to pursue tougher academic and student performance standards, better teacher recruitment methods and plans to turn around failing schools.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
YOU are INVITED!
School District of the City of Pontiac
“A World Class School District - We Put STUDENTS First”
Excellence, Efficiency, & Equity
Dr. Thomas G. Maridada, II, Superintendent
Strategic Reform
Community Meeting
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
Odell Nails Administration Building
47200 Woodward Ave. - Pontiac
We need your input to hit our target!
• Strategic Plan Review
• Input & Ideas
• Brainstorm
Dr.. Robert A. Martin
Chief Deputy Officer of Strategic Reform
For more information, call 248-451-6835
Georgette C. R. Johnson
Director of Communications
School District of the City of Pontiac
47200 Woodward Avenue
Pontiac, MI 48342
248.451.6897 [51897]
www.pontiac.k12.mi.us
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT!
Posted: Sunday, 08 November 2009 3:52PM Grant To Boost Michigan Science, Math Teachers |
| Addressing the shortage of math and science teachers who will equip Michigan's vulnerable students with the skills they need to compete in the work force, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation has awarded the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation with a $16.7 million grant to establish a new statewide teaching fellowship program. The new W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Woodrow Wilson Michigan Teaching Fellowship will provide 240 future teachers with an exemplary intensive master's program in education and place those Fellows in hard-to-staff middle and high schools. Over the five-year timeline, almost 20,000 public school students in Mich. will receive high quality instruction in the critical subject areas of science, technology, engineering and math. Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm joined the Kellogg Foundation and the Woodrow Wilson Foundation at the announcement made last week at the Detroit Science Center. "This grant is an investment in Michigan's future, in the future of our workforce, and in the future of our children," Granholm said. "We must develop a workforce that is prepared for the high-tech careers of tomorrow. The new math and science teachers who emerge from this fellowship will inspire our kids to be excited about careers in science, math and technology." The W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Woodrow Wilson Michigan Teaching Fellowship will recruit a diverse mix of high-achieving candidates who show promise as future teachers. Fellows can be college seniors, recent graduates or career changers. The current market downturn in Michigan has forced many experienced engineers and professionals out of the workforce, making available a talented pool of workers who can share their knowledge and depth of experience with students. "The Kellogg Foundation has worked across the country to improve educational opportunities for vulnerable children from the early years through high school," said Sterling Speirn, president and CEO of the Kellogg Foundation. "But it's especially important to invest in a promising initiative in our home state that will match well-qualified teachers with students most in need." The Fellows, who will be announced in Spring 2011 and receive a $30,000 stipend to complete the master's program, commit to teach for at least three years in a high-need school after they complete their teacher education program. The Fellows also are placed in their schools in cohorts and receive intensive support and mentoring to encourage them to continue teaching as a long-term career instead of making it a brief assignment. As integral partners in the Fellowship, several Michigan universities also will undergo important changes. The adjustments will be necessary to provide the Fellows with the best combination of content knowledge and classroom expertise to most effectively address the challenges of their specific student populations. "Research has shown again and again that the most important element in a student's success is the teacher," said Arthur Levine, the president of the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation and a respected expert on teacher education. "America's schools of education are facing the extraordinary challenge of having to prepare a new breed of teacher, ready to teach the most diverse population of students in our history to the highest levels of skills and knowledge ever required -- all in an outcomes-based system of education. This Fellowship emphasizes intensive practical preparation, rigorous grounding in the subject matter, and extensive supervised teaching experience in the same kind of high-need urban and rural schools where Fellows will later teach." "Having enough great teachers, especially in the math and sciences, shouldn't depend on where a child lives," said Mike Flanagan, Michigan's state superintendent of public instruction. "This program will help heal that disparity." The first statewide Woodrow Wilson Teaching Fellowship, inspired by Levine's research, is already under way in Indiana. The four participating universities are Ball State University, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Purdue University and the University of Indianapolis. The first group of Fellows began their studies this past summer, and the project is being independently evaluated by the Urban Institute. Like Indiana's Fellowship, the Michigan Fellowship will serve as a model for improving teacher education across the country. Universities that participate must match a $500,000 grant and redesign their teacher education programs in science and math within a 21-month time frame by creating a collaborative relationship between the schools of arts and sciences and education. Instead of simply adding a pilot project, these model math and science teacher education programs completely replace the existing programs and are sustained for years to come. Field experience for the Fellows also starts early in the process, as they begin work in high-need schools and gradually take on more teaching responsibilities, similar to the training a medical student would receive in a teaching hospital. Mentoring support for the Fellows continues throughout their first three years in the classroom. The success of the program will be judged by the learning of the students in the Fellows' classrooms, the retention of the teachers and the changes at the university. Targeting the initiative to middle school students as well as to high school students is a key strategy for improving student performance in these subjects. The recently released National Assessment of Educational Progress mathematics results show that 8th graders have made slight gains since 2007, from an average of 281 to 283. But still, just 34 percent of students are scoring at or above the proficient level. In addition, students eligible for the federal student lunch program gained just one point over 2007 and the average score for English learners dropped this year by three points. Based in Battle Creek, the Kellogg Foundation focuses its grants on programs that improve the lives of vulnerable children. The W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Woodrow Wilson Michigan Teaching Fellowship matches the Foundation's goals of building innovative partnerships that create stronger conditions for learning and increasing students' ability to become productive members of society. The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation has a history of administering successful fellowship programs and preparing new generations of leaders. It is respected within and beyond the higher education community. Since the 1980s, the Foundation also has forged partnerships between schools and universities in order to improve professional development for teachers. |
© MMIX WWJ Radio, All Rights Reserved. |
Sunday, November 8, 2009
State of Michigan "Race to the Top" Heavy Lifting (Compliance Issues)
OUR EDITORIAL
School sabotage
Michigan Education Association works to keep reforms, federal money at bay while school districts struggle
With Michigan schools facing an enormous funding gap, the Mi chigan Education Association is attempting to sabotage an effort that could bring in more than $600 million in federal education money.
State policymakers are working to put together one of the essential pieces of legislation required to win federal “Race to the Top” grant money. President Barack Obama is using the money to give states an incentive to enact long overdue education reforms.
Next month state school Superintendent Mike Flana gan must turn in the applica tion for the competition, now being watched by U.S. foun dations for signals about which states are serious about education reform and merit even more funding.
But the prospects for Michigan aren’t good. The MEA, the state’s largest teacher union, is pressuring cowardly lawmakers to block the Race to the Top legisla tion, which includes provisions making it easier for nonteachers to secure classroom positions, if they have critical skills.
This seemingly innocuous change has stirred up intense political fighting, pitting teacher unions against Gov. Jennifer Granholm and others, such as the United Way of South eastern Michigan, who want the Race to the Top funds for Michigan.
Teach for America — the heralded non profit that prepares and places highly talented educators in struggling schools — says it must have an alternative certification pathway for its members to become full-time teachers in Mi chigan.
MEA leaders say they oppose alternative teacher certification because they believe teacher training is essential to properly instruct students. “This is not an union issue,” MEA spokesman Doug Pratt says. “This is a funda mental belief … that teachers who go through a traditional teacher prep process are going to be better for stu dents in the long run.”
But urban districts are having trouble finding highly qualified math and science teachers, in no small part because of the failure of traditional teacher training programs in the state.
That was one of the driv ing forces behind a Friday announcement by the W.K.
Kellogg Foundation that it is investing $16.7 million to establish a new statewide fellowship program to provide 240 teachers for hard-to staff schools.
If the MEA is allowed to sabotage Michi gan’s Race to the Top effort, it will mean the loss of about $600 million in federal money at a time when every classroom is facing an un precedented budget cut. Ultimately, that will mean fewer jobs for teachers, hurting the union’s own members.
It is absolutely essential that Michigan gets this money, and the education reforms that come with it .
School sabotage
Michigan Education Association works to keep reforms, federal money at bay while school districts struggle
With Michigan schools facing an enormous funding gap, the Mi chigan Education Association is attempting to sabotage an effort that could bring in more than $600 million in federal education money.
State policymakers are working to put together one of the essential pieces of legislation required to win federal “Race to the Top” grant money. President Barack Obama is using the money to give states an incentive to enact long overdue education reforms.
Next month state school Superintendent Mike Flana gan must turn in the applica tion for the competition, now being watched by U.S. foun dations for signals about which states are serious about education reform and merit even more funding.
But the prospects for Michigan aren’t good. The MEA, the state’s largest teacher union, is pressuring cowardly lawmakers to block the Race to the Top legisla tion, which includes provisions making it easier for nonteachers to secure classroom positions, if they have critical skills.
This seemingly innocuous change has stirred up intense political fighting, pitting teacher unions against Gov. Jennifer Granholm and others, such as the United Way of South eastern Michigan, who want the Race to the Top funds for Michigan.
Teach for America — the heralded non profit that prepares and places highly talented educators in struggling schools — says it must have an alternative certification pathway for its members to become full-time teachers in Mi chigan.
MEA leaders say they oppose alternative teacher certification because they believe teacher training is essential to properly instruct students. “This is not an union issue,” MEA spokesman Doug Pratt says. “This is a funda mental belief … that teachers who go through a traditional teacher prep process are going to be better for stu dents in the long run.”
But urban districts are having trouble finding highly qualified math and science teachers, in no small part because of the failure of traditional teacher training programs in the state.
That was one of the driv ing forces behind a Friday announcement by the W.K.
Kellogg Foundation that it is investing $16.7 million to establish a new statewide fellowship program to provide 240 teachers for hard-to staff schools.
If the MEA is allowed to sabotage Michi gan’s Race to the Top effort, it will mean the loss of about $600 million in federal money at a time when every classroom is facing an un precedented budget cut. Ultimately, that will mean fewer jobs for teachers, hurting the union’s own members.
It is absolutely essential that Michigan gets this money, and the education reforms that come with it .
Saturday, November 7, 2009
"Design Thinking" to Leverage the Heavy Lifting
What's Thwarting American Innovation? Too Much Science, Says Roger Martin
BY Linda TischlerWed Nov 4, 2009 at 3:18 PMBy pushing the principles of scientific management too far, corporations are short-circuiting their own futures, says the designiest dean of all the business schools. "The enemy of innovation is the phrase 'prove it,'" Roger Martin says.
The folks at McKinsey, Bain, and BCG should be happy that Roger Martin likes his job. Otherwise, he could cause them a heap of trouble.
As it is, the dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto is traveling the country, throwing down the gauntlet to companies who hope to analyze and strategize their way out of a recession by bringing in armies of management consultants. You'll get what you pay for, he warns, and it won't be innovation.
"The business world is tired of having armies of analysts descend on their companies," he says. "You can't send a 28-year-old with a calculator to solve your problems."
The problem, says Martin, author of a new book, The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage, is that corporations have pushed analytical thinking so far that it's unproductive. "No idea in the world has been proved in advance with inductive or deductive reasoning," he says.
The answer? Bring in the folks whose job it is to imagine the future, and who are experts in intuitive thinking.
That's where design thinking comes in, he says.
"If I didn't like my job, I'd go out and create a killer firm that would take on McKinsey head-to-head in their own market. A company would get better results, at a fraction of the price." McKinsey, a $5B company, bills out freshly minted MBAs at $1M a year, Martin says. Their billing structure is 10 times what a design firm typically gets.
We spoke to Martin about why MBAs and designers should learn to get along prior to his coming to New York for the Rotman School of Management Design Thinking Experts series with IDEO's Tim Brown and Target's Will Setliffe.
Fast Company: As we slowly climb out of the recession, everybody's looking for where the next innovation will come from. Why does our pace of innovation seem to be slowing?
Martin: Most companies try to be innovative, but the enemy of innovation is the mandate to "prove it." You cannot prove a new idea in advance by inductive or deductive reasoning.
Fast Company: Are you saying that the regression analysis jockeys and Six Sigma black belts have got it all wrong?
Martin: Well, yes. With every good thing in life, there's often a dark shadow. The march of science is good, and corporations are being run more scientifically. But what they analyze is the past. And if the future is not exactly like the past, or there are things happening that are hard to measure scientifically, they get ignored. Corporations are pushing analytical thinking so far that it's become unproductive. The future has no legitimacy for analytical thinkers.
Fast Company: What's the alternative?
Martin: New ideas must come from a new kind of thinking. The American pragmatist Charles Sanders Peirce called it abductive logic. It's a logical leap of the mind that you can't prove from past data.
Fast Company: I can't see many CEOs being comfortable with that!
Martin: Why not? The scientific method starts with a hypothesis. It's often what happens in the shower or when an apple hits you on the head. It's what we call 'intuitive thinking.' Its purpose is to know without explicit reasoning.
Fast Company: So, if you're not getting these Newtonian moments from your management consultants, where are they likely to come from?
Martin: In a knowledge-intensive world, design thinking is critical to overcoming the biggest block: overcoming analytical thinking and fear of intuitive thinking. The design thinker enables the organization to balance exploration and exploitation, invention of business and administration of business, originality and mastery.
Fast Company: Who's been brave enough to embrace that idea in this market?
Martin: When he first took over, A.G. Lafley at P&G was brilliant enough to realize they were missing a lot about the holistic consumer experience by sticking to things that were rigorously quantified. For example, when the company moved into beauty products, they were looking at face cream. And the scientists decided it must be about pore coverage. So they analyzed the hell out of pores and said 'We can cover pores better than anybody.' So when women in their research started talking about wanting to feel beautiful and desirable, they'd say, 'Don't talk about that. We don't know how to quantify that!' And they couldn't understand why stupid women would go off to department stores and pay ten times more when they could cover pores just as well. Ten years ago, P&G couldn't prove they could sell women billions of dollars of Oil of Olay face cream at $30-$60. They could imagine it, but not prove it. Lafley took it as a management challenge to see across the divide.
Fast Company: If you don't have A.G. Lafley or Steve Jobs at the helm, how can you sell your organization on the idea of an intuitive leap instead of a scientific leap?
Martin: You don't have to convert the whole organization to design thinking. Propose a little experiment--say, three months in length--where you test out a bite-sized chunk of a problem using this method. If you have a little success, be sure to then attach metrics to it. In that way, you turn the future into the past in a way they understand.
Fast Company: We're a little biased toward the designers here. Don't they bear some of the responsibility for the gap in understanding?
Martin: Absolutely. Like anybody who takes a job in another country, and needs to learn the local language in order to function, design thinkers need to learn the language of reliability, terms such as proof, regression analysis, and best practices.
Fast Company: Sounds like there's a promising future for somebody who's bilingual and can combine both approaches.
Martin: This is a fascinating time, and there's an interesting battle coming. One of these smallish design firms might combine the best of the analytical from the business world and the best intuitive thinking from the design world and become gigantic. There would be massive traction for it. It wouldn't be the first time that a little company in a garage saw things differently.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
CONGRATULATIONS are IN ORDER!
School leaders elected in Pontiac, other districts
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
By DIANA DILLABER MURRAY
Of The Oakland Press
Early unofficial results gave board President Damon Dorkins and school activist Caroll Turpin the top places in a tight race for two, four-year terms on the Pontiac school board.
Turpin was the top vote-getter, with 3,708, and Dorkins second, with 3,019. Angelena Thomas took 2,336, Ben Shattuck, 2,080, and Tommaleta Hughes, 1,474, in the race for the two, four-year terms, according to the Oakland County Clerk’s Web site.
A Pontiac teacher came out the surprise top vote-getter in the race for a one-year term on the board. Mary Barr, who teaches career and technology at Pontiac Middle School, had 3,300 votes.
Barr, who rode through town in a horse-drawn carriage bearing her sign during the campaign, won the seat away from Trustee Hazel Cadd, who was appointed to fill out the term in September 2008, with 1,147 votes, and Kaino Phillips with 2,620.
After his victory speech at the Coyote Club in downtown Pontiac, Dorkins, a 33-year-old Pontiac police officer, said: “This is a good thing for the board.
“This means the community is supportive of the leadership, which means the board can move forward with those programs to educate our kids. This support shows we have a chance. We will push the administration to hold everyone accountable in the district.”
Turpin, a social worker, who is married to dentist Bruce Turpin and has four adult children, was leading early in the race. A school activist, she has volunteered on many district committees, including Oakland Press Roundtable and the Financial Stabilization & Recovery Committee.
During her campaign, Turpin promised, “I will work to make our schools the No. 1 school of choice for parents and children.”
Dorkins said, “I am looking forward to working with Caroll. She’s a great advocate for kids and now it is time to take her avocation to another level as a trustee on the board.”
Voters across Oakland County selected the candidates they thought best to steer their schools through an assault of state cuts in school funding.
There was an upset in the Madison District school board, which has also survived some major struggles this year, including the firing of a superintendent, the hiring of a new one and the overcoming of a threat of jail terms if a deficit wasn’t eliminated.
Board President Keith Beguhn, who was vying for a third term, lost by only a few votes a tight race for one of two, four-year terms to challenger Albert Morrison, who had 649 votes and newcomer Alexander Marr, with 490. Beguhn had 471 votes.
Beguhn said the board and staff worked together to eliminate the deficit and he was hoping voters would give him the chance to help keep the district out of deficit without hurting programs and closing schools. James Owens was also vying for two, four-year terms.
In the second race, challenger Kenneth Melchert had 559 votes to win the a two-year partial term away from incumbent Sue Barron, who had 447 votes. Anjela Freeman had 146 votes.
In the race for a one-year partial term incumbent, Jennifer Lorenz, who opted to run for the partial term rather than another four-year seat on the board, was way out in front of Michael Hohner, with 682 votes to his 444 votes. Hohner was running to fill the seat to which he was appointed.
Other districts with contested races are Avondale, Berkley, Birmingham, Farmington, Huron Valley, Novi, Oxford, Royal Oak, South Lyon and Troy.
AVONDALE — In a five-candidate race for four, four-year terms, incumbents Cynthia Tischer, with 1,996 votes, and Cyndi Pettit, with 1,819, took the lead and challengers Sean Johnson, with 1,689, and Sid Lockhart, with 1,597, also won a seat on the board. John Nofs had 1,463.
BERKLEY — Incumbent Randy Travis, with 2,458 votes, barely claimed another term on the board, with Ryan O’Gorman taking 2,976, and Sheryl Stoddard, with 2,949, leading a close race for the other two of the three, six-year terms up for election. They beat out newcomers Paul Honkala, with 2,242, and Deborah Rittman, with 2,376. Incumbent Roger Blake ran unopposed for a partial term.
BIRMINGHAM — Incumbent Lori Soifer, with 3,305, won a tight race against challenger Katie Reiter, with 3,172 for one, four-year term on the board.
FARMINGTON — Incumbents Priscilla Brouillette, with 4,606 votes and Frank Reid, with 4,416, beat out four challengers to win the two, four-year terms on the board. Challengers were Cindy Flynn, Umesh Gandhi, Dennis Homant and Steven Stimson. In a separate race, incumbents Sheilah Clay and Gary Sharp ran unopposed in their bids for six-year terms.
HURON VALLEY — Six candidates vied for two, four-year terms. Incumbent Sean Carlson and newcomer Rebecca Walsh were running ahead of challengers Ron Boyd, Thomas Kolakowski, Jennifer Peitz and May Russell.
OXFORD — Robert Martin and Kimberly Shumaker were running far ahead of Franz Langegger in the competition for two, four-year terms on the board.
ROYAL OAK — Carrie Beerer came out on top with 4,138 votes n a race for two, four-year terms, with Jeff Bringer taking the second seat with 3,865 votes. Arthur Makarewicz won 3,149.
SOUTH LYON — Five candidates sought two, six-year terms. Candidates were incumbents Greg Downey and George Ehlert and challengers Steven Brummer, Frank Domanico and Carl Towne.
TROY — Four candidates — incumbents Paula Fleming and Nancy Philippart and challengers Bruce Bloomingdale and Bernie Lourim — vied for two, four-year terms. In a separate race, incumbents Ida Edmunds and Wendy Underwood ran unopposed for two, six-year terms.
School board races were uncontested in Brandon, Northville, Novi, Rochester, Southfield and West Bloomfield Township.
Contact staff writer Diana Dillaber Murray at (248) 745-4638 or e-mail diana.dillaber@oakpress.com. Karen Workman also contributed to this story.
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
By DIANA DILLABER MURRAY
Of The Oakland Press
Early unofficial results gave board President Damon Dorkins and school activist Caroll Turpin the top places in a tight race for two, four-year terms on the Pontiac school board.
Turpin was the top vote-getter, with 3,708, and Dorkins second, with 3,019. Angelena Thomas took 2,336, Ben Shattuck, 2,080, and Tommaleta Hughes, 1,474, in the race for the two, four-year terms, according to the Oakland County Clerk’s Web site.
A Pontiac teacher came out the surprise top vote-getter in the race for a one-year term on the board. Mary Barr, who teaches career and technology at Pontiac Middle School, had 3,300 votes.
Barr, who rode through town in a horse-drawn carriage bearing her sign during the campaign, won the seat away from Trustee Hazel Cadd, who was appointed to fill out the term in September 2008, with 1,147 votes, and Kaino Phillips with 2,620.
After his victory speech at the Coyote Club in downtown Pontiac, Dorkins, a 33-year-old Pontiac police officer, said: “This is a good thing for the board.
“This means the community is supportive of the leadership, which means the board can move forward with those programs to educate our kids. This support shows we have a chance. We will push the administration to hold everyone accountable in the district.”
Turpin, a social worker, who is married to dentist Bruce Turpin and has four adult children, was leading early in the race. A school activist, she has volunteered on many district committees, including Oakland Press Roundtable and the Financial Stabilization & Recovery Committee.
During her campaign, Turpin promised, “I will work to make our schools the No. 1 school of choice for parents and children.”
Dorkins said, “I am looking forward to working with Caroll. She’s a great advocate for kids and now it is time to take her avocation to another level as a trustee on the board.”
Voters across Oakland County selected the candidates they thought best to steer their schools through an assault of state cuts in school funding.
There was an upset in the Madison District school board, which has also survived some major struggles this year, including the firing of a superintendent, the hiring of a new one and the overcoming of a threat of jail terms if a deficit wasn’t eliminated.
Board President Keith Beguhn, who was vying for a third term, lost by only a few votes a tight race for one of two, four-year terms to challenger Albert Morrison, who had 649 votes and newcomer Alexander Marr, with 490. Beguhn had 471 votes.
Beguhn said the board and staff worked together to eliminate the deficit and he was hoping voters would give him the chance to help keep the district out of deficit without hurting programs and closing schools. James Owens was also vying for two, four-year terms.
In the second race, challenger Kenneth Melchert had 559 votes to win the a two-year partial term away from incumbent Sue Barron, who had 447 votes. Anjela Freeman had 146 votes.
In the race for a one-year partial term incumbent, Jennifer Lorenz, who opted to run for the partial term rather than another four-year seat on the board, was way out in front of Michael Hohner, with 682 votes to his 444 votes. Hohner was running to fill the seat to which he was appointed.
Other districts with contested races are Avondale, Berkley, Birmingham, Farmington, Huron Valley, Novi, Oxford, Royal Oak, South Lyon and Troy.
AVONDALE — In a five-candidate race for four, four-year terms, incumbents Cynthia Tischer, with 1,996 votes, and Cyndi Pettit, with 1,819, took the lead and challengers Sean Johnson, with 1,689, and Sid Lockhart, with 1,597, also won a seat on the board. John Nofs had 1,463.
BERKLEY — Incumbent Randy Travis, with 2,458 votes, barely claimed another term on the board, with Ryan O’Gorman taking 2,976, and Sheryl Stoddard, with 2,949, leading a close race for the other two of the three, six-year terms up for election. They beat out newcomers Paul Honkala, with 2,242, and Deborah Rittman, with 2,376. Incumbent Roger Blake ran unopposed for a partial term.
BIRMINGHAM — Incumbent Lori Soifer, with 3,305, won a tight race against challenger Katie Reiter, with 3,172 for one, four-year term on the board.
FARMINGTON — Incumbents Priscilla Brouillette, with 4,606 votes and Frank Reid, with 4,416, beat out four challengers to win the two, four-year terms on the board. Challengers were Cindy Flynn, Umesh Gandhi, Dennis Homant and Steven Stimson. In a separate race, incumbents Sheilah Clay and Gary Sharp ran unopposed in their bids for six-year terms.
HURON VALLEY — Six candidates vied for two, four-year terms. Incumbent Sean Carlson and newcomer Rebecca Walsh were running ahead of challengers Ron Boyd, Thomas Kolakowski, Jennifer Peitz and May Russell.
OXFORD — Robert Martin and Kimberly Shumaker were running far ahead of Franz Langegger in the competition for two, four-year terms on the board.
ROYAL OAK — Carrie Beerer came out on top with 4,138 votes n a race for two, four-year terms, with Jeff Bringer taking the second seat with 3,865 votes. Arthur Makarewicz won 3,149.
SOUTH LYON — Five candidates sought two, six-year terms. Candidates were incumbents Greg Downey and George Ehlert and challengers Steven Brummer, Frank Domanico and Carl Towne.
TROY — Four candidates — incumbents Paula Fleming and Nancy Philippart and challengers Bruce Bloomingdale and Bernie Lourim — vied for two, four-year terms. In a separate race, incumbents Ida Edmunds and Wendy Underwood ran unopposed for two, six-year terms.
School board races were uncontested in Brandon, Northville, Novi, Rochester, Southfield and West Bloomfield Township.
Contact staff writer Diana Dillaber Murray at (248) 745-4638 or e-mail diana.dillaber@oakpress.com. Karen Workman also contributed to this story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)